Home Page   |   Site Map   |   Contact
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 3
Previous  |  Next
CV
Table of Contents
{ Abstract / Résumé }
Chapter 1 : Introduction
Chapter 2 : Fiber Bragg Gratings
{ 3.1 : FBG spectral response simulation in the coupled-mode formalism }
{ 3.2 : FBG synthesis and reconstruction }
3.3 : Calculated FBG spectral and impulse responses
{ 3.4 : Reconstruction examples }
{ 3.5 : Methods for characterizing FBGs with loss or with refractive index and period chirp components }
3.6 : Summary
3.7 : References
Ph.D.  /  { Web Version }  /  Chapter 3 : FBG simulation and reconstruction  / 
MBI
Physics Diploma
Photos
Post-Doc
Chapter 4 : FBG characterization by optical low coherence reflectometry
Chapter 5 : FBG strain sensors
Chapter 6 : FBG based humidity and temperature sensor
Chapter 7 : OLCR based picometric vibration sensor
Chapter 8 : Conclusions and future work
Appendix : A, B, C, D and E
Other parts

Chapter 3 : FBG simulation and reconstruction



Fig. 3-1 presents a synthetic view of the subjects treated in this chapter. A FBG can be described in three domains : space (z), frequency (n) and time (t). The methods used to go from one representation to the other are also indicated. The T-matrix method allows to calculate the complex spectral response r(n) when the complex coupling coefficient distribution q(z) is known [3-1]. The complex coupling coefficient amplitude is proportional to the refractive index modulation amplitude Dnac(z), while its phase represents the chirp function that mixes the average refractive index Dndc(z) and the period L(z). Inversely, q(z) can be retrieved from r(n) by the layer-peeling method [3-2]. This method is based on the coupled-mode formalism [3-3]. The impulse response h(t) can be obtained from the spectral response by Fourier transform.

Fig. 3-1 Different paths between the FBG representations

This chapter presents the T-matrix and the layer-peeling methods. The T-matrix is used to calculate the spectral and impulse response of homogeneous and non-homogenous gratings. From these responses, the layer-peeling method is studied and the optimal reconstruction parameters are presented. We also analyze the reconstruction limits observed for gratings with nearly 100 % reflectivity.

The T-matrix and the layer-peeling methods are only defined for lossless FBGs and for this reason we have adapted the two methods to takes account of loss effects.



3.1 FBG spectral response simulation in the coupled-mode formalism
3.1.1 Coupled-mode equations
3.1.2 Analytic solution for homogeneous FBGs
3.1.3 Numerical solution of the Riccati equation for non-homogeneous FBGs
3.1.4 T-matrix method
3.1.5 Causal T-matrix method
3.2 FBG synthesis and reconstruction
3.2.1 Overview of reconstruction methods
3.2.2 Discrete Layer-peeling
3.2.3 Reconstructed FBG interpretation
3.3 Calculated FBG spectral and impulse responses
3.3.1 Homogeneous FBG examples
a Homogeneous FBG examples (Constant length)
b Homogeneous FBG examples (Constant refractive index modulation amplitude)
c Homogeneous FBG examples (Constant product fo the length and the refractive index modulation amplitude)
3.3.2 Non homogeneous FBG examples
a Non homogeneous FBG examples (With discontinuities and ramps)
b Non homogeneous FBG examples (Period step-chirped)
3.3.3 Source effect
a Source effect (Bandwidth)
b Source effect (Detuning)
3.4 Reconstruction examples
3.4.1 Reconstruction limits
3.4.2 Layer thickness
3.4.3 Number of points
3.4.4 Reduction of the Gibb's effect
3.4.5 Reconstruction from the complex spectral response
3.4.6 Reconstruction from the complex impulse response
3.5 Methods for characterizing FBGs with loss or with refractive index and period chirp components
3.5.1 Characterization of FBGs with loss
3.5.2 Method to distinguish period chirp and DC refractive index chirp
3.6 Summary
3.7 References


Top   |   JavaScript
Path :  www.lphg.ch Ph.D. { Web Version } Chapter 3
Previous  |  Next